What follows are a bunch of panoramas I have made using the excellent Hugin panorama software.  I highly recommend checking it out.

First, two panoramas from our wonderful January 2010 holiday in Opotiki with Phil, Leanne, Craig, Sally, Tim and Alice.

Click any of the panoramas to get a BIG version.

Sunny day at the beach in Opotiki

Sunset in Opotiki (photos by Jess)

And now the sea-vew from our new home, Plimmerton/Mana.

If you look at the hills to the left side of the pictures, you can see some blackened areas caused by a major scrub fire last weekend.

Yachts in Plimmerton

Mana Island from Plimmerton

Beach at Plimmerton (five minutes walk from my new house)

And finally, a great view of the harbour just before dusk from our Libertarianz friends Colin and Nik’s place

Wellington Harbour:

Made by me (click to embiggen).

If you are confused, look here.

Faults reported on forums range from cracked glass, screen flickering, yellow tinged or noisy screens and have been experienced by users around the world as far afield as North America, Europe and Australia.

It’s a product sold globally – why on earth would you emphasise that these forum users were from “far afield”?  The early 1990s called, they want their amazement at the global scope of the Internet back. 

Furthermore, it mentions major Western countries as “far afield” places, not actual far-afield places like Scott Base, Antaractica or Barrow, Alaska.

Labour’s Lianne Dalziel said deprivation of liberty was a core function of the state …

From TV3’s report on private prisons.

• bookdepository.com
• bookdepository.co.uk

The important thing about this is that the sites have subtly different prices.

For instance, The Years of Rice and Salt on the .com site is £4.58.  On the .co.uk site: £4.81. The price is 5% higher.

I looked up another book, Lost Girls.  .com price: £24.35.  .co.uk price:  £26.31.  This price is 8% higher.

Confusing, right?  I would suggest browsing both URLs to check which price is best.  They both have free shipping to anywhere in the world.

I am guessing the reason for the two URLs is to sell books which are popular in the US cheaper on the .com domain name, and books which are popular in the UK cheaper on the .co.uk domain.  Or maybe it is something demanded by US publishers.

Yep, we’re all doomed.

The man is a complete embarassment to the tattered remnants of the classical liberal wing of ACT.

“Aren’t ACT lucky they chose a quality researcher and safe pair of hands like David Garrett over an embarrassing loose cannon like Lindsay Mitchell.”

What I find really delicious is that Garrett was placed on the party list to represent the law-and-order strand of ACT policy, which includes being tough on criminals and punishing violent behaviour – and here he is trying to get into a fight himself.

“I know Garrett’s views are not Act views. [Leader] Rodney Hide and [deputy leader] Heather Roy wouldn’t have those views.”

Garrett’s rudeness, intolerance and homophobia, sexual harrassment, drunken TV appearances and apparent willingness to get into physical fights suggests, once again, that whatever issues a conservative is most against are in fact representative of his own hidden desires and urges.

I will, however, applaud lprent today.  He got something right yesterday when he withdrew Bill English’s address from a post.

Well done.

Now, I know that these lightbulbs can save money; that’s why we have them in our flat.  I have seen three of the bulbs burn out within two years, though – they definitely don’t last forever.  But the magnitude of the supposed saving sounded totally astounding to me. 

SoI decided to check up on the figures.  First of all, the Kaptiti Observer didn’t get the number wrong.  The estimate of a 1:78 cost:benefit ratio is contained in this council report.

Wikipedia suggests that a cost:savings ratio per lightbulb over their lifetime of between 1:12 and 1:47, depending on the cost of the electricity.  For the Kapiti bulbs to be magically twice as beneficial as the best-case scenario presented in another estimate seems unlikely, even if the council are able to get the bulbs for a great bulk rate ($2 per bulb).

Another factor is that US studies include in the benefits’ side of the equation is the fact that less heat is generated by the efficient bulbs, so air conditioning units don’t have to work as hard.  This wouldn’t be a factor on the Kapiti coast; in fact, in the winter, a small amount of additional heating will be needed as the bulbs will be generating less heat than incandescent bulbs.

What I suspect they are doing is assuming a massively best-case scenario.  Electricity is super-expensive.  The two lightbulbs in each home are running 24/7.  The home has advanced air conditioning as in the US.  The home is forced to pay handymen to climb up on ladders to replace lightbulbs on a contract rate of $18 per bulb.  Incandescent bulbs are the most expensive ones available in the supermarket, rather than the cheapest ones at the Warehouse.  Maybe petrol to drive to the supermarket and buy new incandescent lightbulbs is included.

What the cost-benefit analysis doesn’t seem to include is the cost of printing leaflets, lightbulb storage, distribution and administration for the program.  I guess the council is ‘donating’ these costs as part of its pro-energy-efficiency budget.  We can also throw in the cost to the EECA (and taxpayers) of providing the $74,000 loan.

All of these assumptions, multipled by 17,000 households, produce a misleading savings amount, to say the least.

The other assumption being made is that households can’t run their own cost-benefit analysis – as have I, and most households I know – and installed their own CFL lightbulbs using their own money.

The program is relatively small, but the aggregate cost of all of these feel-good council programs makes up your total rates bill: thousands of dollars a year.

All I can say is, there ain’t no such thing as a free lightbulb.

Is the Minister aware that Dr Paul Moon, a professor of history at the Auckland University of Technology and a well-known expert in pre-European history, is of the view that many of the claims about the festival of Matariki are tenuous at best, and that with regard to it supposedly being linked to planting times Maori had much better natural science to rely on and “did not need a three-month advance warning of when to prepare for kumara sowing.”?

Marty G comments angrily:

There was a chorus of outrage from Labour at the racism that lies behind this kind of claim that seeks to invalidate Maori history and culture … the Maori Party MPs just sat there. One would have expected them to have been leaping to their feet to rebut this slander against their culture.

Research into Matariki by Paul Moon essentially points out that much of the discourse around Matariki is simply modern viewers looking at the past with rose-tinted glasses.  Different tribes had different ideas about Matariki too.  For some, Matariki probably wasn’t a celebratory time because it was the middle of winter; a time when elders often died and food was rationed.  Even war was temporarily put on the back burner.  In general, it would be a poor signal to start planting kumara; pre-European Maori knew when to plant crops without using the rising of the Pleiades as a signal.

It seems to me that Garrett’s comment actually gives Maori more credence than the standard “noble savage” post-modern discourse about Matariki being promoted by the other politicians.  “Oh, look at this warrior race, using the stars as a calendar to plan crops!  Isn’t that cute?”

I welcome the Matariki celebrations.  Any excuse for a party is OK with me.    But the ideas around making Matariki an official holiday just don’t reflect reality – and when Garrett questions the PC version of things he is immediately smacked with the ‘racist’ label and accused of invalidating Maori history – when in fact Moon’s research is aimed at making ideas about Maori history more accurate!

Of course Maori culture should be celebrated, but making official holidays and erecting bilingual street signs makes Maori culture into a humourless bureaucratic exercise.  It becomes another box to tick on a government form, and that’s just sad.  Perhaps leftist intellectuals like Marty G think Maori culture is too weak to survive by itself.