A bizarre blog post on The Stranded contains some extremely odd thinking.  During the debate about Matariki, ACT MP David Garrett asked Chris Finlayson in Parliament:

Is the Minister aware that Dr Paul Moon, a professor of history at the Auckland University of Technology and a well-known expert in pre-European history, is of the view that many of the claims about the festival of Matariki are tenuous at best, and that with regard to it supposedly being linked to planting times Maori had much better natural science to rely on and “did not need a three-month advance warning of when to prepare for kumara sowing.”?

Marty G comments angrily:

There was a chorus of outrage from Labour at the racism that lies behind this kind of claim that seeks to invalidate Maori history and culture … the Maori Party MPs just sat there. One would have expected them to have been leaping to their feet to rebut this slander against their culture.

Research into Matariki by Paul Moon essentially points out that much of the discourse around Matariki is simply modern viewers looking at the past with rose-tinted glasses.  Different tribes had different ideas about Matariki too.  For some, Matariki probably wasn’t a celebratory time because it was the middle of winter; a time when elders often died and food was rationed.  Even war was temporarily put on the back burner.  In general, it would be a poor signal to start planting kumara; pre-European Maori knew when to plant crops without using the rising of the Pleiades as a signal.

It seems to me that Garrett’s comment actually gives Maori more credence than the standard “noble savage” post-modern discourse about Matariki being promoted by the other politicians.  “Oh, look at this warrior race, using the stars as a calendar to plan crops!  Isn’t that cute?”

I welcome the Matariki celebrations.  Any excuse for a party is OK with me.  :-)   But the ideas around making Matariki an official holiday just don’t reflect reality – and when Garrett questions the PC version of things he is immediately smacked with the ‘racist’ label and accused of invalidating Maori history – when in fact Moon’s research is aimed at making ideas about Maori history more accurate!

Of course Maori culture should be celebrated, but making official holidays and erecting bilingual street signs makes Maori culture into a humourless bureaucratic exercise.  It becomes another box to tick on a government form, and that’s just sad.  Perhaps leftist intellectuals like Marty G think Maori culture is too weak to survive by itself.

  • ScoopIt
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • TailRank

11 Responses to “David Garrett: Racist?”

Marty G is many things, but I wouldn’t classify him as an intellectual.

Gravatar

LOL!

Gravatar

[...] and Business Grants: Natasha Fullerleah on Welfare and Business Grants: Natasha FullerLuke H on David Garrett: Racist?BK Drinkwater on David Garrett: [...]

Gravatar

[...] The Left Vs Free SpeechPacific Empire » Blog Archive » Common Sense at The Standard on David Garrett: Racist?me2 on Epitaph: Abandoned gang fortifications in ChristchurchLuke H on Welfare and Business Grants: [...]

Gravatar

Why are you trying to assassinate Garretts character? I know of pretty strong evidence that he is not racist – so strong it makes your ‘mud sticks’ heading laughable.

Gravatar

Harry, read the post again – this is one of the rare occassions where I defend Garrett.

Gravatar

The headline is as far as most people will get and the two words together provide a suggestion.

Gravatar

The two words with a question mark pose a question: IS he a racist? That pushes people to read the post and find out more.

Gravatar

“Yes, yes, absolutely no scientific basis for Matariki, rose tinted glasses, all a bunch of politically correct nonsense, nanny state, more subprime deregulation, bla bla la blab.”

Can’t wait for Christmas and Easter! Oh yes, and the Queen’s Birthday celebration, which is not on her birthday. Don’t get me started on the legally binding Waitangi Day celebrations and its continued and abject betrayal by “New Zealand.”

In other words, a pathetic non argument – more tripe from the right. But then, what else would one expect?

Gravatar

Quite unrelated – on the surface -but I just had the unpleasant experience of being intimated a racist because I was objecting to somebody’s disruptive behaviour in a shared environment. An admittedly young woman who had just perhaps discovered the power of the R bomb and was hanging out to use it. So many issues here. It’s such a powerful accusation, such a despised, and rightly so – when it’s real – mindset, that to misapply it is also a kind of abuse, it’s the abuse of a lie. A powerful kind of lie that can shut down a debate or silence an opponent practically on the spot, because it is such an injustice, no-one wants to be guilty of it. It’s a conversational nuke. It has the power to devastate public debate if we don’t look seriously at claims of racism and see if they’re justified. How utopian.

Gravatar

That’s an uncommonly deep comment denise – thanks! I think I will have to steal your line “conversational nuke”. :-)

Gravatar

Something to say?