<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infantilization, and stupid regulations aimed at &#8220;protecting&#8221; children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pacificempire.org.nz/2007/04/06/infantilization-and-stupid-regulations-aimed-at-protecting-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pacificempire.org.nz/2007/04/06/infantilization-and-stupid-regulations-aimed-at-protecting-children/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://pacificempire.org.nz/2007/04/06/infantilization-and-stupid-regulations-aimed-at-protecting-children/comment-page-1/#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacificempire.org.nz/?p=336#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>I googled it and it sounds exactly like the laws mentioned in the article, which have made British universities reluctant to accept 17-year olds.  (btw, here&#039;s an interesting story about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070412/SCHOOLS/704120312/1026&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;16-year old who started college at 12&lt;/a&gt;).  

In general I think the reform is unnecessary because I don&#039;t see a huge problem with the status quo.  I mean, sexual abuse is a big deal, but the main danger is from people known to the child, rather than strangers.  The fear of child abuse has had some really counterproductive results - vigilantism, false accusations, the shortage of male teachers, witchhunts and so on.  This is just another example.

As for the drinking age: it should be lowered, if anything.  While arbitrary minimum ages are necessary for some things, I also think that children should be able to prove maturity in court and get an exemption from minimum ages if necessary.  I mean particularly for teenagers who go to university early, get a job and leave home early, and so on - they are living as an adult, so should be treated like one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I googled it and it sounds exactly like the laws mentioned in the article, which have made British universities reluctant to accept 17-year olds.  (btw, here&#8217;s an interesting story about a <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070412/SCHOOLS/704120312/1026" rel="nofollow">16-year old who started college at 12</a>).  </p>
<p>In general I think the reform is unnecessary because I don&#8217;t see a huge problem with the status quo.  I mean, sexual abuse is a big deal, but the main danger is from people known to the child, rather than strangers.  The fear of child abuse has had some really counterproductive results &#8211; vigilantism, false accusations, the shortage of male teachers, witchhunts and so on.  This is just another example.</p>
<p>As for the drinking age: it should be lowered, if anything.  While arbitrary minimum ages are necessary for some things, I also think that children should be able to prove maturity in court and get an exemption from minimum ages if necessary.  I mean particularly for teenagers who go to university early, get a job and leave home early, and so on &#8211; they are living as an adult, so should be treated like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bec</title>
		<link>http://pacificempire.org.nz/2007/04/06/infantilization-and-stupid-regulations-aimed-at-protecting-children/comment-page-1/#comment-5757</link>
		<dc:creator>Bec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pacificempire.org.nz/?p=336#comment-5757</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the legislation or thought it through, but the new Working With Children legislation in Victoria (Australia) *might* have the same effect, since minors/children are those under 18.

It&#039;s all very well to criticise the law, and I agree that it has unintentioned and ridiculous consequences in this instance - but proposing reform is a far more difficult and challenging task.  So what would you propose? (I&#039;m interested in the drinking issue as well as the university entrance issue!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the legislation or thought it through, but the new Working With Children legislation in Victoria (Australia) *might* have the same effect, since minors/children are those under 18.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all very well to criticise the law, and I agree that it has unintentioned and ridiculous consequences in this instance &#8211; but proposing reform is a far more difficult and challenging task.  So what would you propose? (I&#8217;m interested in the drinking issue as well as the university entrance issue!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

