When I saw the AP headline “Boyish US Envoy Becomes Hearthrob in China,” I knew immediately who it was about. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia, Christopher R. Hill – chief nuclear negotiator with North Korea -made a brief visit to Wellington last year, and one of my lecturers arranged a roundtable discussion with Vic Uni IR students. He seemed genuinely enthusiastic about talking to us – unsurprising, maybe, when he spent most of the rest of the visit with Helen Clark and Winston Peters. He was charismatic, flattering us by saying our questions were far better than those of Clark or Peters, and deftly defusing the anti-American tone of some of the questions. Even better – his knowledge and analysis of the seemingly intractable six-party talks was unequalled. (More about that experience and the simulated six-party talks we did afterwards, in this post)
This is the sort of publicity most politicians would kill for…

“He’s so charming and attractive,” said Li Kenna, a desk clerk at the five-star hotel Hill stays at in Beijing. “He sometimes asks me how I am in the mornings,” she said. “He’s one of our nicest guests.”

Christopher Hill is popular in Beijing – if the cellphone screensaver shown above is any indication – but now he’s a diplomatic superstar, as well. Passport’s report late last year of the demise of the six-party talks (“Failure in the six-party talks was inevitable”, 12/26/2006) was greatly exaggerated, but gives a good idea of the difficulties of his position:

Our sympathies are with Mr. Hill, sandwiched as he is between the unrealistic demands of the White House and the unstable negotiating tactics of Pyongyang.

First, Hill must deal with Mr. Bush’s North Korea policy: bluster and saber-rattling one day and pleading for a return to talks another…

But the Bush administration’s negotiating foibles pale in comparison to the calculated unpredictability of the North Koreans.

It’s great to hear of Christopher Hill’s success in getting the North to agree to denuclearize. The agreement is probably the best we can hope for at this stage, removing any imminent danger and avoiding a dangerous collapse. $400 million in aid is a small price to pay. Strong Chinese pressure was probably an important factor, but Christopher Hill can take credit for some excellent diplomacy. As Thomas Barnett said before the agreement was signed:

Chris Hill would go down as the administration’s most successful diplomat if he can pull this off.

It’s interesting, though, that the agreement could have been signed six years earlier, if the State Department had gotten it’s way.

As an aside, Chris Hill is ArmsControlWonk Jeffrey Lewis’ “favourite diplomat”. From his site, a couple of classic Hill quotes:

NPR: There is one nuclear reactor in North Korea that experts say could produce a nuclear weapon. Is that at the heart these discussions?

HILL. Well, to be sure, there is a nuclear reactor at a place called Yongbyon in North Korea, not to be confused with Yongpyong in South Korea, which is actually a ski resort.

And my personal favourite:

Q: Can’t you at least get a Yongbyon freeze? That would seem to be a…

HILL: Oh, you think that’s easy? [Laughter] I’ll tell you what — put that boom microphone down and you get it done and I’ll buy you a beer.

  • ScoopIt
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • TailRank

6 Responses to “North Korea to Denuclearize, and Everybody Loves Chris”

Do you think Pyongyang will hold up their end of the bargain?

Gravatar

Why not? It seems like the aid is more important to them at the moment than sabre-rattling, especially since the fizzle of their nuclear test. And it seems like the Chinese have applied a lot of subtle pressure (more on that in Barnett’s post).

Of course, misperceptions and groupthink may prevail in Pyongyang. Kim Jong-Il can hardly be considered a rational actor. But I predict that this deal will prevail in the short to medium term.

BTW, I added you to the blogroll.

Gravatar

Indeed, China seems to be the keystone, in addition the excellence of Hill and the perseverance of an otherwise maligned US administration in holding to the six party talks.
I wonder how much effect Shinzo’s nationalism had on China’s decision to lean on Dear Leader?

At any rate, thanks for the blogroll heads up, too kind! :)

Gravatar

North Korea cannot be trusted. It will continue to enrich plutonium until the inspectors come, it will then hide it – along with the weapons it now has. It does not have to destroy any of its weapons, and it knows if things don’t go its way it can spit the dummy, evict inspectors and do another test.

North Korea is one of the biggest liars on the international stage, it works in such false premises as to be beyond belief.

This will do nothing for the 100,000s of men, women and children in gulags – will keep the army and party well fed, as there is no pressure to reform at all. The chance was there to let this damned regime fall, the Japan and US sanctions were biting bad, it hurt – now the bastards can keep partying on the corpses of the people, like they have for the last 60 years.

The media do a great job ignoring the death toll there and the reasons for it – Iraq is open and transparent and the US is there. North Korea’s constant murder and abuse of its citizens gets ignored because there aren’t enough images of it, and Fisk would get locked up if he tried to report from it.

Gravatar

Scott: I’m not sure that letting the regime collapse would be a good idea, in the context of the NE Asia power balance. Robert D. Kaplan has the best analysis of that possibility – “When Korea Falls”.

Of course I agree about the unmitigated evil of the regime, but realpolitik leaves few options open for the US. Halting the nuclear program and giving them some fuel oil and food might be the best option.

In the long run, more cellphones and laptops are getting into the DPRK, and more refugees are escaping via China (using cellphones to coordinate escapes). The Kims can’t hide from the rest of the world forever – that sort of technology promotes transparency. In fact before too long we might see cellphone photos from inside the DPRK and we’ll finally see images of the prison camps…

Gravatar

I know the risks of collapse, but a likely collapse scenario is a new central administration that embarks on radical reforms. The regime was propped up in the early 90s on promises it would halt nuclear activity – now it has nuclear weapons. What next?

The openness in North Korea is very much on the borders, my favourite idea is to send in thousands of hand crank powered radios via air with small parachutes, already tuned into South Korean radio. The best thing for North Korea is to open up for more investment, but the Kim cult must be dismantled to – for that Kim Jong Il must die.

Gravatar

Something to say?